رابطه علیت وحدوث

نوع مقاله : علمی- تخصصی در ارتباط با علوم انسانی

نویسنده

دانشیار فلسفه و حکمت اسلامی، دانشگاه پیام نور

چکیده

در میان مسائل فلسفی قانون علیت از لحاظ سبقت اولین مساله ای است که فکر بشر را به خود متوجه ساخته و او را به تفکر و اندیشه برای کشف معمای هستی وادار کرده است. شناخت جهان و بحث از حدوث و قدم آن نیز همواره مورد نظر دانشمندان بوده وهست. این توجه بر اساس پیوند و رابطه این دو اصل با یکدیگر تبیین بهتری می یابد. لازمه پذیرش اصل علیت، بحث از علت هستی بخش هستی و از ابتدا داشتن یا نداشتن جهان است. بر همین اساس بحث از امتناع تخلف معلول از علت تامه که از لوازم اصل علیت است، پایه اصلی بحث از حدوث و قدم عالم است. علاوه بر آن تبیین حدوث یا قدم عالم وابسته به تبیین ملاک احتیاج شیء به علت است زیرا با نفی علیت پرسش از چرایی پیدایش جهان و حدوث و قدم آن بی معنی خواهد بود. لذا تنها در پرتو اصل علیت ولوازم آن است که بحث از حدوث و قدم عالم تبیین می گردد. دراین نوشتار دو اصل امتناع تخلف معلول از علت تامه و ملاک احتیاج شیء به علت به عنوان اصول پیوند دهنده اصل علیت با مباحث اندیشمندان مختلف درمساله حدوث و قدم عالم مورد توجه قرار گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Causality and Occurrence Relationship

نویسنده [English]

  • Ali Reza Parsa
Associate Professor of Islamic philosophy and wisdom, Payame Noor University
چکیده [English]

Among the philosophical issues, the causality rule in terms of originality is the first one that has attracted the human mind’s attention and made him think to discover the mystery of the world. Understanding the world and discussing its origin and its location has always been a concern for scientists. This issue will be better explained by the link and relationship between these two principles. The necessity to accept the principle of causality is to argue about the cause of existence, and having or not having the world from the beginning. Accordingly, the discussion of the refusal of the inflicted wrongdoing for the very cause which is the product of the principle of causation is the main basis of the discussion of the origin and location of the universe. In addition, the explanation of the origin or location of the world is dependent on the explanation of the criterion of the object's need because with rejection of causation, the question of why the universe has been existed and its origin and location would be meaningless. Therefore, only in the light of the causality principle and its requirements, the discussion of the universe can be explained. In this article, the two principles of the refusal of invalidity of causality from the perfect cause and the criterion of the object’s need to a cause have been considered as the principles linking the causality principle with the scholars’ discussions on the origin and location of universe. Philosophers have insisted on the ancient world by accepting the principle of refusal of different reasons from perfect cause and theologians with the rejection of this principle and through the discretion of the subject are paying attention to the incompatibility of this principle with God's cause and concluded the origin of universe on this basis. But philosophers, by violation of the views of theologians on this issue, emphasized on the necessity of accepting the principle of non-reflection of the disability to be the cause of the existence by expressing the premise of the preference principle and by proving “possibility” and the probability of the lack of causality, know the object’s need to the cause beyond the origin. They, then consider “possibility” as the criterion of the object’s need to the cause and reasoned the location of universe on this basis and do not see its acceptance in opposite of the revelation data.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Human reason
  • cause
  • origin
  • location
  • philosopher
  • theologians